Glasstire
Betsy Huete / January 2018
Art Forum
Owen Duffy / December 2017
Studio International
Natasha Kurchanova / October 2017
Mubi
Michael Sicinski / May 2017
Artspace magazine
Interview with Andrew Goldstein / February 2017
ArtPulse
Stephen Knudsen / November 2016
Calvert Journal
Samuel Goff / June 2016
New Statesman
Anoosh Chakelian / August 2016
The Spaces
Will Strong / July 7 2016
Creator’s Project
Sami Emory / May 27, 2016
Visionaire
Lars Peterson / May 25, 2016
Artefuse
Kristine Roome / May 2016
Monopol (Germany)
August 26, 2015
Texte zur Kunst
Anastasiya Osipova / June 2015
Art Forum
Kate Sutton / May 2015
This is Tomorrow
Laura Herman / March 2015
Brooklyn Rail
by Aaron Richmond / March 2015
Hyperallergic
by Olga Kopenkina / February 2015
Visione Sospresa / Il Cinema Dell’Assenza
by Frank Viso / January 2015
Fandor
By Jordan Cronk / December 17, 2014
arte creative magazine
by Jean-François Rettig / November 2014
MUBI Notebooks
by Daniel Kasman / October 02, 2014
ArtNews Summer 2014
Review by Ann Landi
Art in America
Review by Andrew M. Goldstein / May 2014
Houston Chronicle
Review by Molly Glentzer / January 24, 2014
Elephant magazine #17
Interview with Katya Tylevich / December 2013
Hyperallergic
by Claire Breukel / July 31, 2012
Icon Magazine
Andrea Lippke / January 2012
Modern Painters
Andrew M Goldstein / May 2011
Art / Das Kunstmagazin
August 2011
T / New York Times
Johnny Misheff / June 2011
l’Uomo Vogue
Grazia D'Annunzio / May 2011
Art Newspaper
Marisa Katz / December 2010
Bomb Magazine
Interview with Andrew M Goldstein / March 2010
Artforum
John Kelsey / April 2005
Moscow Art Magazine
Yevgeniy Fiks / 2005

http://glasstire.com/2018/01/18/anton-ginzburg-at-barbara-davis-gallery/

Anton Ginzburg at Barbara Davis Gallery
by Betsy Huete

Summoning the ghosts of Mikhail Matyushin and Alexander Rodchenko, Anton Ginzburg’s show Construction Proxy, currently on view at Barbara Davis Gallery in Houston, claims to explore “notions of aura, materiality and historical memory” via a kind of splicing together of Russian Constructivism and Western post-war modernism. While this may be Ginzburg’s personal and intellectual exercise to realize the work, it doesn’t necessarily mean that’s what the work is actually doing. So if Construction Proxy is simply pointing to history rather than embodying its tenets, it raises the question: why are we all relegating this work to an 8th-grade book report on modernism?

These paintings are not auratic. They are fundamentally semiotic, which is far more interesting anyway. The rapid-fire seriality of this work undercuts the time the viewer would need to conjure and engage in aura. As our eyes dart in succession from one painting to the next — as if we’re reading a scrawling line of text stretching around the room with the rapidity of machine gun fire — we follow a natural inclination to parse out difference among paintings that are largely similar. Therefore, the viewer’s role here becomes one of a decoder rather than a passive participant awash in aura or some historical investigator.

The coding is most aggressive in the gallery nearest the entrance, housing mostly the ORRA_C series (all 2017). Displayed like a playful sampling of breast pockets, Ginzburg employs a kind of visual violence as thick, colorful lines thrash diagonally at each paintings’ lower border. The centrally located diamonds — depending on color — alternately read as portals or inhibitors. Ultimately, we are left to ponder on their adjacency rather than consider them individually, as if we’re piecing together a sentence in a foreign language.

The entire ORRA series in this show are octagonally-shaped and roughly the size of a stop sign. Ginzburg does the work the most justice when he treats them as what they are: signs. Moments of opacity and rigidity read effectively as signage. The evidence of Ginzburg’s hand — for example, with the delicate, painterly green brushstrokes of ORRA_2C_05 — consequently serve as a distraction. The ORRAs should be considered for their syntax, not their handwriting.

ORRA_2D_03 (2017) is the best example of opacity within the series. Though we see little to no evidence of his hand here, the work is paradoxically more human: a diamond of flesh buckled in by Boy Scouts of America lines on a background of tablecloth. There’s something apple-pie American about this painting, yet the sharp angles feel perverse and violent, the lines reading like restraints.

But it’s the combination of the COEV Compositions (2016) with the Houston Color-Space Initiatives (2018) that translate the most effectively as language. The simplistic, binary-colored murals bracket off the gallery space in a way that reads as paragraphs. They form a kind of parenthetical guideline for the mirrored COEV lines to play and compete with each other. Digging underneath, resting atop, burrowing through — but nevertheless persistently engaging with — a horizon line, with the mirrored lines creating a tightly-controlled display of chaos as they reflect back the other lines from the ORRA paintings in the space. They in turn become yet another form of flickering signage, constantly changing based on the viewer’s perspective. While Houston Color-Space Initiative #1 reads too closely as an obvious gender binary, Houston Color-Space Initiative #2 is a much more believable landscape painting that allows us time to consider the COEV Compositions not just for their sentence structure, but also as characters, tools, and landmarks.